Connect with us


 Woman says one night stand with hubby she wanted to divorce made her withdraw case



  • Woman withdraws divorce case after one night stand with estranged pastor hubby, what happend?
  • “Wee, ni mtamu saana, I can't allow another woman to enjoy that thing,” says woman after withdrawing divorce case Woman confesses Good Sex made her withdraw divorce case from court
  • Woman withdraws divorce cease from court after fire bedroom action with hubby she wanted to dump
  • Would you consider withdrawing a divorce case you have filed in court if your spouse impresses you with their last-ditch actions to save the union? A woman just did that, and she is the talk of town.

A Kenyan couple has amused social media after they opened up about how their marriage that was on the brink of collapse was saved. In her words, Juliet said that her relationship with Pastor Mark (her husband) started with a one-night stand.

The same one-night stand, she said, saved her marriage months after she filed for a divorce at the family court. Juliet married preacher Mark in 2017.

Pastor desserts wife to go preach

Between 2017 and 2018, the marriage was rosy. But from 2018, there was trouble in paradise.
“All of a sudden, Mark started having church missions that would last weeks and months.
Sometimes, he would go out of the country for fellowship and return after a month. There was a time he came home after three and a half months. I became tired. I wanted to spend more time with him. I wanted to enjoy the goodies in marriage. But he was never there. After three years, I
decided to file for a divorce on grounds of desertion,” Juliet narrated.
Before the divorce was filed, she had always complained to her man and called a few elders, but
he never seemed to understand the weight of the situation.
He just assumed that his wife was okay because he used to send her money and buy her a few gifts. When the man of God was served with the papers, it was a shocker for him.
“I thought I was doing enough, but I wasn’t for sure. I realized that she needed me more than the
money and gifts. I knew it was time to save my marriage. I tried to talk to her, talked to her parents and our friends but she had made up her mind and she was going. Even as a pastor who counsels couples, there was nothing I could do,” Mark narrated.

How did Mugwenu Doctors help SDA pastor?

He says that one of his friends, an SDA pastor, is the one who gave him an idea that saved the marriage. The pastor connected him with Mugwenu Doctors, who are experts in solving relationship problems.
The SDA pastor confirmed that Mugwenu Doctors had helped him recover over KSh 400,000 he had lost to a call girl who had visited his home in Donholm. On contacting Mugwenu Doctors,they told Pastor Mark that they were going to use a spell that would destroy the ongoing divorce case.
They, however, told him that his actions to desert his wife were uncalled for. They asked him if he was indeed serious about restoring his marriage, and he said yes, and the anti-divorce spell was cast. After the spell, he was asked to go see his wife and talk to her, which he did.“I did not believe it, when I just arrived home and looked at her, she smiled. I hugged her tight and cried telling her how much I was sorry and that I wanted to make amends,” the man continued.

How do spells to block divorce work?

On her part, Juliet says she felt very light on that day. Her heart was beating hard and fast.
“I felt like I was in love again after a long time. What followed was some nice bedroom moments. And the rest, as they say, is history. Since then, the ninth cloud has been my portion nearly every day. Weeh, ni mtamu saana, I can't allow another woman to enjoy that thing,” she narrated.
In mid-2021, a few weeks after the case had been filed, she went and withdrew it. They are now a happy couple blessed with two kids.
They are operating a church in Kitengela. Mark no longer goes for his long missions. But when he has to go, they go together.
The marriage of Juliet and Pastor Mark is among the hundreds that Mugwenu Doctors have saved from treading the path of divorce using their powerful anti-divorce spells.
These spells work like love spells by increasing the degree of love between the parties that are almost separating and also slowing down the divorce case and, at last, ensuring it is successfully withdrawn from court without complications, just like the case of Juliet and Mark.

Here are some mixed reactions we sampled from people who interacted with the story:

Mary: Wow, that’s amazing! I’m so happy for them. Love always wins in the end.
JohnEmma: What a stupid decision. She should have dumped him and moved on. He doesn’t deserve her forgiveness.
Tom16797: This is so dumb. They’re just delaying the inevitable. They’ll be back in court sooner or later.
Lisa Spikes: I don’t get it. Why would she take him back after he deserted her? Does she have no self-respect?
KinuthiaJD: Good for them. Divorce is not the answer. They need to work on their marriage and trust God.
AnnaNyathira: This is so unrealistic. No woman in her right mind would do that.
David@Mutola: I wish my ex-wife had done the same. I still love her and miss her every day. Maybe there’s still hope for us.
Sara_Mwadime: This is so inspiring. I’m going through a similar situation and this gives me hope. Maybe I should give my husband another chance.
Mark Gibendi: This is so unfair. She should have taken him to the cleaners and made him pay for his mistakes. He got off too easy.
EmmaNgugi: This is so romantic. He must have really loved her and regretted his actions. I hope they live happily ever after.

What are other spells by Mugwenu Doctors

Apart from divorce spells, Mugwenu doctors also offer:
 Spells for family problems
 Solutions for generational curses
 Spells to destroy evil eye and black magic
 Money bags for financial success
 Protection charms
Fertility charms for both men and women
 Finding missing person
 Spells to make someone obsessed
 Catch cheating partner
 Catching thieves
 Solution for being used by men or women
 Misunderstandings with family members

 Cure for night mares and stress
 Spells to see enemy in dreams
 Spells to control stubborn spouses
 Herbs for body cleansing
 Herbs for losing weight
Find more spells here
Are you facing marital problems? Do you want to save your marriage from divorce? Do you want to rekindle the love and passion in your relationship?
If yes, then you need to contact Mugwenu Doctors today. They are the experts in solving
relationship issues using powerful spells and charms.
They have helped hundreds of couples restore their marriages and enjoy the ninth cloud every day. Don’t let your marriage fall apart.
Call or email Mugwenu Doctors now and get the best solution for your situation. Remember, a happy marriage is a happy life.
Phone: +254740637248

Kenya Exposed allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on: Follow us on Twitter and Facebook page.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Exclusive: Mohan Galot Shares His Story on Overcoming Obstacles in Manchester Outfitters Ltd



Mohan Galot

In a legal battle that spanned over a decade, Mohan Galot, a billionaire, successfully reclaimed his company, Manchester Outfitters Ltd (MOL), from his nephews who had embezzled billions of shillings in revenue. Yesterday, the High Court ruled in favor of Galot, declaring him the rightful director of the garment maker, bringing a satisfying end to the long-standing dispute.

Mohan and his nephew Pravin Galot have been battling in court for the control of the company incorporated on November 3, 1977.

But Justices Lilian Mutende, Chacha Mwita and Mugure Thande on Thursday found that the director of Manchester Outfitters Ltd is Mohanlal Pusharam Galot who is also the governing director.

Mohan testified in court that Manchester Outfitters was established in 1954 by his father the late Lachman Pusharam Galot as a sole proprietorship to carry on the business of uniform production and distribution.

It was later converted into a 50/50 partnership between Pusharam and Mohan.

They employed Mohans brothers, Lalchand Pusharam Galot, Ganeshlal Pusharam Galot and Sohanlal Pusharam Galot.

When Pusharam died on November 12, 1973, he left a will dated October 27, 1973, in which he bequeathed his four sons a quarter of his 50 per cent interest in the partnership.

As a result, Mohan’s share of the partnership increased to 62 per cent while each of his brothers got 12.5 per cent of the business.

The issues for determination according to the bench were who the shareholders of MOL are, and who are the directors of MOL.

They relied on the company’s articles of association, specifically article 10 which indicated that once Lalchand died, Mohan was to automatically and without any meeting of shareholders or directors assume the position of governing director of MOL.

He was to hold office until his death or vacate office under Article 13.

As the new governing director, the Judges said Mohan could exercise all the power and authority of the position.

“One of the powers he could exercise was the removal at any time of a director of MOL, howsoever appointed, other than a permanent director,”

Judges said it is not in dispute that Pravin was appointed managing director but at the same time indicated no evidence was placed before the court to demonstrate that Pravin or Rajesh Galot were ever permanent directors in MOL.

“The claim by the defendants that they were permanent directors is therefore without any basis,” the judges ruled.

During the hearing, Pravin and Rajesh admitted that their father Ganeshlal, Mohan, Sohanlal and Lalchand are brothers and the sons of Pusharam.

According to Pravin, he was appointed Managing Director of MOL in 1991.

His case was that there was no board resolution removing him from an office he had held for 31 years.

But the Judges in their ruling found that the removal of Pravin, Rajesh and Ganeshlal as directors of MOL by Mohan in 2007, was an exercise of the power conferred upon him as governing director by Article 10.

“In the circumstances, the conclusion we come to on this issue is that Pravin and Rajesh ceased to be directors of MOL on 14 March 2007 while Ganeshlal ceased to be a director on June 7, 2007,” they said

“It follows therefore that Mohan is the only remaining director of MOL,” they added.

The three-judge bench also cited a registrar record which contains notification of change of directors and secretaries dated March 17, 2007 showing that Pravin and Rajesh ceased to be managing director and executive director respectively, with effect from March 14, 2007.

They subsequently found and held that the shareholders of Manchester Outfitters Limited are Lalchand Pusharam Galot with 1 management share and 349 ordinary shares.

Mohanlal Pusharam Galot with 1 management share and 349 ordinary shares. Galot Limited with 700 ordinary shares and the director is Mohan.

Following the court’s ruling, Mohan in a notice to its employees welcomed the decision saying “I have been reaffirmed as not only the sole director but also its chairman and Governing Director of MOL.”

He assured the staff members that their employment remains secure amidst the changes which will be made.

“We appeal for your patience and cooperation during this period of transition,” read the notice.


Kenya Exposed allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on: Follow us on Twitter and Facebook page.

Continue Reading


Land Grabbing Scandal: Lawyer Mwenda Njagi Takes Legal Action against President Ruto



Lawyer Mwenda Njagi
  • MP Kihara‘s Controversial Utterances Fuel Lawyer Mwenda Njagi’s Lawsuit against President Ruto

Ndabibi farm residents through their city lawyer Mwenda Njagi have vowed to sue President William Ruto in his personal capacity over the link to land grabbing after MP Kihara utterances.

The threat comes days after the MPJane Kihara made a public utterance insisting that President William Ruto is the bonfide owner of the said land.

Lawyer Mwenda Njagi while speaking her secured the release of A 90-year-old man had been remanded in an Industrial area prison for 12 years said that nobody is above the law.
The old mzee allegedly encroached on the disputed land which he has lived for decades.

The threat comes days after Naivasha Member of Parliament Jane Kihara made a public utterance insisting that President William Ruto is the bonafide owner of the contested 5000-acre piece of land at Ndabibi area in Naivasha.

Speaking at the Industrial area prison after securing the release of a 90-year-old man believed to be an alleged beneficiary of the land for over four decades Mwenda said that residents have instructed him to sue,

” Since the Naivasha member of parliament has told us who the owner is, We shall be moving to court to sue the President, ” Lawyer Mwenda said.

He said that court restraining orders related to the said parcel have already been violated.

Naivasha Mp Kihara Speaking at a public baraza, Kihara accused a section of leaders of being behind a syndicate of land grabbers targeting unsuspecting owners.

The defense comes one week after 19 people were arrested for taking down a concrete fence surrounding the land and destroying property worth 2.3 million shillings.

In the case the residents obtained an injunction with restrained inspector James Karanja of GSU, OCS Kongoni police station, IG,Attorney, and area chief Ndabibi location as interested party

here is a video

Kenya Exposed allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on: Follow us on Twitter and Facebook page.

Continue Reading


Surprising Details Emerge as Two Men Face Charges for Python-Related Bombing Incident



  • Shocking: The Story of Two Men Accused of Bombing a Woman’s House and Using a Python

  • How Two Men Allegedly Used a Python in an Explosive Crime: What We Know

Two men accused of bombing a woman’s dream home in Georgia also plotted to have a “python eat the victim’s daughter,” according to prosecutors. 

The suspects — identified as 37-year-old Stephen Glosser and 34-year-old Caleb Kinsey — were indicted on March 7 on multiple federal charges in connection with the bombing that occurred in Richmond Hill last year.

Investigators said the men used an explosive device involving Tannerite that ultimately blew up part of the woman’s home on Jan. 13, 2023. No one was injured in the explosion.

Two 18-year-olds arrested in Philadelphia bus stop shooting that injured 8 teens

While a motive is unclear, NBC News reported that one of the men “had a prior relationship” with the woman, though the extent of that relationship was not disclosed.

According to prosecutors, the suspects used surveillance equipment to spy on the victim from December 2022 until the time of the bombing, and they created “a plan to kill, intimidate, harass, or injure” her in various ways — like shooting arrows into her door.

Two men have been arrested for allegedly bombing a woman’s house in Richmond Hill, Georgia, on Jan. 13, 2023. (Credit: WSAV)

The pair also planned to release a “large python into the home to eat the victim’s daughter,” mail dog feces or dead rats to the victim’s home and scalp the victim, court documents allege.

In an interview with Nexstar’s WSAV last year, the victim, Larissa Apperson, said she and her daughter had only lived in their new home for less than 12 hours before the explosion.

“This home on Demeries Lake was my dream home… I am absolutely devastated by what happened. I am still in disbelief,” Apperson previously said, adding that she was planning to rebuild the part of her house that was destroyed.

Glosser and Kinsey have since been charged with stalking, using an explosive to commit a felony, conspiracy to use an explosive to commit a felony, and possession of an unregistered destructive device. Kinsey also faces additional charges of making false statements during the purchase of a firearm and possession of firearms by a convicted felon.

The conspiracy charge carries a statutory penalty of up to 20 years in prison with an added 10 years if convicted for the charge of using an explosive to commit a felony.

Kenya Exposed allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on: Follow us on Twitter and Facebook page.

Continue Reading